Disposed

Parvez Alam Ansaari v. Vill. Panchayat Karandola Janpad Panchayat Bastar C.G.

Chhattisgarh HC10 Nov 2022WP227/311/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to decide an unregistered civil suit and a pending application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC within 30 days, continuing the existing status quo order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide interim application within 30 days; status quo order continued.

Parvez Alam Ansaari Vs Vill. Panchayat… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WP227 No. 311 of 2022

¶5

Parvez Alam Ansaari S/o Mohammad Ali, Aged About 52 Years R/o Viil Karandola Tehsil Bhanpuri District Bastar, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Vill. Panchayat Karandola Janpad Panchayat Bastar C.G. Through Its Sarpanch Santosh Baghel S/o Tamkuram Baghel Tehsil Bhanpuri District Bastar, Chhattisgarh

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner Mr. Vikas A. Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Advocate

¶11

SB.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

¶12

Order On Board 10/11/2022

¶13

The present petition has been preferred for issuance of a direction to the Fourth Civil Judge, Class-II, Bastar at Jagdalpur to decide an unregistered Civil Suit (Parvez Alam Vs. Gram Panchayat, Karandola, Janpad Panchayat, Bastar) expeditiously and also to decide the pending application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC.

¶14

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a similar matter bearning No. WP227 No.323 of 2022

¶15

¶16

has been disposed of on 10.8.2022 by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, therefore, the present petition may also be disposed of in the same terms of the said order, to which, learned counsel for the respondent has no objection.

¶17

In view of the joint submissions made by the parties and also considering the fact that the application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC is still pending and the same has not been decided by the trial Court and further considering the fact that this Court has passed an order of status quo on 15.6.2022, I am inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction to the trial Court to decide the application filed by the petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC within a period of 30 days from the next date of hearing given by the trial Court. It is made clear that the interim order granted by this Court on 15.6.2022 shall continue till disposal of the application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC by the trial Court.

¶18

With the aforesaid observations, this petition is disposed of.

¶19

No order as to costs. Sd/-

¶20

( Deepak Kumar Tiwari)

¶21

Judge

¶22

Shyna

Parvez Alam Ansaari v. Vill. Panchayat Karandola Janpad Panchayat Bastar C.G.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvez Alam Ansaari v. Vill. Panchayat Karandola Janpad Panchayat Bastar C.G.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tosh Kumar Sahu Vs Smt. Gayatri Sahu

Smt. Rambati Nag Vs Senapati Nag

Smt. Neha Purohit Vs Krishna Dave

K. Swarupa Vs K. Dharam Rao

Sushilchandra Pagariya Vs M/s Ultra Tech Cement Limited

Ripusudan Verma Vs the State of Chhattisgarh