Petitioner failed to appear or provide instructions upon hearing recall. Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P(227) No.586 of 2019
Sushilchandra Pagariya S/o Late Mangilal Pagariya Aged About 56 Years R/o Fifth Floor, Mahaveer Plaza, Behind Devi Laxmi Bai Hospital, Tagore Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
2. Gajraj Pagariya S/o Late Shri Mangilal Pagariya R/o 24, Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur (C.G.), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents
For the Petitioner: None. For Respondent No.1: Shri Aman Pandey on bejhalf of Shri Ankur Kashyap, Advocates. For Respondent No.2: Shri Sabyasachi Badhuri, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari
Order on Board
10.11.2022
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Priya.
Sushilchandra Pagariya
M/s Ultra Tech Cement Limited
Gajraj Pagariya
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
