This order restored a Revision Petition (C.R.R. 689 of 2019) previously dismissed by default. The High Court allowed the setting aside application and reinstated the original revision petition number.
The current C.R.M.P allowed; C.R.R. 689 of 2019 restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 594 of 2022
Versus
For Petitioner: Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For Respondents: Shri Parth Shrivastava appears on behalf of Shri Anand Shukla, on advance copy.
Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J
Order On Board
11.04.2022
was dismissed in default by this Court vide order dated 21.03.2022.
revision petition, I am inclined to allow the same.
restored to its original number.
Sd/(Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE
vivek
Shankar Lal Agrawal and another
Kaushlya Bai and another
Sanjay S. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
