The judge allowed the State's petition under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C., condoning delays in filing prior applications and the petition itself. The appeal against an acquittal judgment was permitted and the matter listed for registration and admission.
Allowed the petition and permitted the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the judgment of acquittal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet Cr.M.P. No. 544 of 2020
State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Bodhan
| 11.04.2022 | Shri Raghvendra Verma, Govt. Advocate for the State/Petitioner. None for the Respondents, though served. Heard on I.A. No.01/2021, an application for condonation of delay in filing of documents. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned at para 3 of the said application, I am inclined to allow the same. |
|---|---|
| The said application is accordingly allowed and the documents filed on 29/30.06.2020 by way of memo of submission are taken on record. I.A. No.01/2021, thus, stands disposed of. Also heard on I.A. No.02/2020, an application for condonation of delay in filing this petition. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. The said application is accordingly allowed and delay in filing this petition is hereby condoned. I.A. No.02/2020, thus, stands disposed of. The present petition has been filed under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal. After perusal of the impugned judgment dated 18.06.2019 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) in Criminal Case |
| No.4570/2012, I am inclined to allow this petition and the Petitioner is hereby permitted to prefer an appeal against the said judgment. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and disposed of. Registry is directed to register the case as a regular appeal under the head |
|---|
| “Acquittal Appeal” and list the matter thereafter for its admission. Sd/- |
| (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge |
Nikita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave should be granted to the State for filing an appeal against the acquittal judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Chhattisgarh
Bodhan
Sanjay S. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
