Dismissed

Jaibunisha Khan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC22 Jan 2016WPC/182/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a regular stage carriage permit which remained pending. The High Court issued a direction for expeditious consideration of her application and all other pending applications on the concerned route. The Court explicitly reserved its opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to decide the petitioner's application and all other pending applications for the concerned route within reasonable time.

Jaibunisha Khan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPC No 182 of 2016

¶4

Jaibunisha Khan, wife of Shri Suleman Khan, aged about 38 years, resident of Near Police Line, Gariyaband, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Transport, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

Regional Transport Authority, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner Mr. Santosh Gupta, Advocate Respondent/State Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. A.G.

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

22.01.2016

¶14

Grievance of the petitioner is that she has moved an application before the respondent on 19.10.2015 for grant of regular stage carriage permit on the route Raipur to Ga riyaband via Abhanpur, Rajim and back one return trip only.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the said application expeditiously.

¶16

Learned State counsel would submit that the application of the

¶17

petitioner shall be considered and decided along with all pending applications for the concerned route, in accordance with law and on its own merits as expeditiously as possible.

¶18

In view of the fact that petitioner's application is pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the petitioner's application and all other applications pending before it for the concerned route, within reasonable time.

¶19

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Judge

¶22

(Prashant Kumar Mishra)

¶23

Shyna

Jaibunisha Khan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaibunisha Khan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ubhay Ram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/s Shrikishan And Company Vs Additional Commissioner Commercial Tax And Ors.

M/s Payal Travels Vs State Transport Authority Raipur

Smt. Urmila Bai Kewat Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Parvati Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rahul Jain Vs State Of Chhattisgarh