Smt. Urmila Bai Kewat v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Holders of land acquired for a power project filed writ petitions for compensation disbursement, enhancement, and rehabilitation benefits. The High Court observed that remedy lies in applying to the Land Acquisition Officer or civil court under Section 18 of the 1894 Act. Since petitions were withdrawn, they were dismissed with liberty.
What did the court decide?
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move appropriate applications before competent authority regarding compensation release, enhancement, and rehabilitation policy benefits.