The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a criminal revision as abated because the petitioner had died prior to the hearing, based on a submitted death certificate issued in August 2006.
The Criminal Revision was dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 75 of 2005
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
| For Petitioner | Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent /State | Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Dy. G.A. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board
21/1/2016
The applicant had preferred the instant revision against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 02.02.2005 passed by the Sessions Judge, Raipur in Criminal Appeal No.331 of 2004, which in turn, arise out of judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 07.12.2004 passed by JMFC, Gariyaband District Raipurin Criminal Case No.1553 of 2002.
Learned counsel for the applicant would make statement at the bar and would show to this Court the death certificate issued by the Registrar, Birth and Death, Gariyaband District Raipur, duly attested by SHO, PS, Gariyaband certifying that applicant Ubhay Ram S/o Matwar had died on 15.08.2006.
Copy of the death certificate is retained and made part of the record of the criminal revision.
In view of the death of the applicant, the Criminal Revision has abated. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision is dismissed as abated. Sd/-
Judge
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Shyna
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ubhay Ram S/o Matwar
State of Chhattisgarh through District Magistrate, Raipur
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
