Disposed

Parvati Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC22 Jan 2016WPC/172/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the construction of a shopping complex on alleged school-reserved land was disposed. The petitioner was directed to file a fresh representation before the Collector for decision following a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit fresh representation before the Collector within one week; Collector to decide within one month after hearing Panchayat.

Parvati Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Public Procurement and Tenders | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 172 of 2016

¶5

Parvati Sharma D/o Shri Ramdas Sharma, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village & Post Damakheda, Tahsil Simga, P.S. Simga Civil & Revenue District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶9

The Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶10

The Collector, Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

¶11

The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Simga Civil & Revenue District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

¶12

Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Bhatapara Civil & Revenue District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

¶13

Gram Panchayat, Damakheda, Through Its Sarpanch Village Damakheda, Civil & Revenue District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

¶14

---- Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner : Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents-State : Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. GA for the State

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶17

Order On Board

¶18

22/01/2016

¶19

Petitioner is aggrieved by raising of construction of a shopping complex by Janpad Panchayat, Simga over a land which is allegedly not only reserved for school but has been transferred to Panth Shri Grindhmuni Naam Saheb Government Middle and Higher Secondary School, Damakheda.

¶20

¶21

It appears, the petitioner has already submitted representation before the Sub Divisional Officer and other State authorities.

¶22

Let the petitioner prefer fresh representation before the concerned Collector along with complete documents within one week. The concerned Collector shall thereafter look into the matter and decide the representation after providing opportunity of hearing to the Janpad Panchayat. Let the Collector take decision in the matter within a further period of one month.

¶23

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Judge

¶26

Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶27

ashu

Parvati Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvati Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ubhay Ram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/s Shrikishan And Company Vs Additional Commissioner Commercial Tax And Ors.

M/s Payal Travels Vs State Transport Authority Raipur

Smt. Urmila Bai Kewat Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rahul Jain Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Jaibunisha Khan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh