The National Lok Adalat dismissed the civil appeal because the respondent had vacated the shop as per an application, thereby disposing of the matter without drawing a separate conclusion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR rc.G^ •|ngI©1Beii£h yr" SECOND APPEAL N6^ ^ /10
Appellant :^K.ush Kumar Gupta S/o Chandrika Prasad Defendant Gupta Aged About 51 years 'Director M/s Chandrika & Sons <^0.-^J Agrasen Chowk Link Road ^.•2'^°u •-"^^3v^ Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^•v ^ y ^^"' erL Versus ^-•"
ReSpondent >mt. Rehana Riyazuddin Plaintiff W/o Dr.Riyazuddin Aged about 62 years Agrasen Chowk Link Road Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.)
SECOND CWIL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF C.P.C.
NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURTCAMPUS : BILASPUR
^JLNo^65/2010
Appellant Defendant
Kush Kumar Gupta
Versus
ResDQndent Plaintiff Smt Rehana Riyazuddin
Appellant in person.
Smt MeeraAnsari, Advocate along with the Respondent.
ORDER
(Passed on this 8th October, 2016)
Sd/-
"^Tudge - LokAdalat Sd/Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur
Pnya
H.^^C^issarh ^aspu^^^
Kush Kumar Gupta
Smt Rehana Riyazuddin
Judge
Member
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
