Dr. Rimesh Kumar Dixit's appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither he nor his counsel appeared, and no representation was filed even in the second round of hearing.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FA No. 18 of 2001
Dr. Ramesh Kumar Dixit, S/o Chandrika Prasad Dixit, aged about 46 years, through Mukandpur PS, Tehsil Amarpatan, Dist : Satna - (CHH)
---- Appellant
Versus
Smt. Hemlata Dixit, W/o Dr. Ramesh Kumar Dixit, aged about 43 years, R/o Bandhwapara, Bilaspur, P.S. Sarkanda, Teh. & Dist : Bilaspur CHH. Present Address through Rajesh Bajpai Banwarilal Garden, Old Sarkanda, Dist : Bilaspur - (CHH)
---- Respondent
| For Appellant | : | None appears |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent | : | Ms. Priya Mishra appears on behalf of Dr. |
| N.K.Shukla, Senior Advocate. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
Order On Board
07/10/2016
Sd/-
( Sanjay Agrawal ) Judge
Anjani
Dr. Ramesh Kumar Dixit
Smt. Hemlata Dixit
Sanjay Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
