Allowed

Vaman Kumar Netam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC5 Oct 2016MCRC/5853/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh, relying on the prosecutrix's denial of the prosecution case, allowed bail to the applicant and directed his release upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000 with a surety.

What did the court decide?

Bail application allowed; applicant released upon furnishing personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Vaman Kumar Netam Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Cheating and Forgery | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶2

MCRC No. 5853 of 2016

¶3

Vaman Kumar Netam, S/o. Ghanshyam Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o. Village Vijaypur, Police Station & Post Mohla, Civil & Revenue District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

¶4

---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Mohla, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent

¶5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Anupam Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

¶6

Order On Board

¶7

05.10.2016

¶8

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.18/2016 registered at Police Station- Mohla, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 312, 313, 366 & 376 ( p )( < ) of Indian Penal Code.

¶9

As per the prosecution case, a report was made by the prosecutrix on 10.03.2016 that from 31.12.2013 the applicant on the pretext of marriage committed sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix wherein she became pregnant and she was subjected to forceful abortion and thereafter the applicant refused to marry with her.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the prosecutrix has been examined before the Court and she has not supported the case of the prosecution. He relied on the statement of the prosecutrix and would submit that under the circumstances, no

¶11

case is made out against the applicant; therefore, he may be released on bail.

¶12

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail, however, he is not able to dispute the fact that the prosecutrix has been examined and she has not supported the case of the prosecution.

¶13

Perused the case diary and documents. Reading the statement of the prosecutrix, it appears that she has completely denied the case of the prosecution, therefore, under the facts & circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

¶14

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.

¶15

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

¶16

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge

¶17

Ashok

Vaman Kumar Netam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vaman Kumar Netam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rambaran Vs Smt. Lalita Devi

Munna Lal Saket Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ashok Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rakesh Kumar Bodlekar and Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Daman Lal Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ghanshyam Vs State Of Chhattisgarh