Application for restoration of MCC No. 468 of 2016. The single-judge bench found sufficient cause shown and allowed the restoration to original number. No substantive legal principles discussed.
Restoration of MCC No. 468 of 2016 to its original number and disposal of the instant application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
MCC No. 725 of 2016
---- Applicants
Versus
---- Respondents
| 04.10.2016 | Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate for the Applicants. iN Mr. |
|---|---|
| Ashok | Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard This is an application for restoration of MCC No. 468 of 2016. For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for restoration of the case. In view of the same, MCC No. 468 of 2016 is restored to its original number. Accordingly, the instant application for restoration is allowed. Sd/- Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants were guilty of sufficient cause to warrant restoration of the matter.
Whether the original matter numbered MCC No. 468 of 2016 should be restored to its original number.
Rambaran
Jaikaran
Hari
Sukhdev
Lalita Devi
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
