No appearance was made on behalf of the Applicant. The Court dismissed the second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for want of prosecution.
The second bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
MCRC No. 5993 of 2016
Munna Lal Saket, S/o. Shri Nand Lal Saket, Aged About 25 Years, R/o. Village Padkhuri No.1, Tahsil Gopdabnas, Police Station & District Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh.
…....Applicant
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Amanaka, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
…....Respondent
| 04.10.2016 | None for the Applicant. iN Mr. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State. Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the applicant, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|
| Ashok | Sd/- Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Munna Lal Saket
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
