Disposed

Ashok Kumar Kurre v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC8 Jan 2015WPS/6755/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the High Court of Chhattisgarh permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a representation regarding a transfer order. The matter was disposed of summarily without adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petition withdrawn with liberty to file representation before the Collector to be decided within four weeks.

Ashok Kumar Kurre Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

9^^
V^,l-i3(3 QK

¶3

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT

¶4

BILASPUR fC.G.)

¶5

fW.P. (S) No..........^:.5..^......../2014)

¶6

PETITIONER

¶7

.....^^ ^^y""'

¶8

Ashok Kumar Kurre S/o Mohanram; Aged About - 29 Year; R/o Village^- Kumekela; Post - - Diwanpur; Tahsil Pathalgaon; District (Revenue 8s Civil) - Jashpur (C.G.)

¶9

V/s

¶10

RESPONDENTS : 1

¶11

State of Chhattisgarh

¶12

Through : The Secretary Tribal Welfare Department; Manta-alay, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur; Tahsil 8s District (Revenue 85 Civil) - Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

The Assistant Director

¶14

Tribal Welfare Department Jashpur; District (Revenue & Civil)

-Jashpur(C.G.)

The Collector Jashpur; Dista-ict (Revenue,8E Civil) - Jashpur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer; Jila Panchayat Jashpur; District (Revenue 8s Civil) - Jashpur (C.G.) The Block Education Officer Pathalgaon; District (Revenue & Civil)-Jashpur(C.G.)

¶20

WRIT PETITION UNDER_ARTICLE 226 OF THE

¶21

<i<

¶22

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

r-^

XI-HC—78

~3:ssi '^wM-ii, vAvt'9, Rii'ii'tiy

¶27

WTCT ^fTNi.c^ ^.. fe .^?. 4 .^. .^ 20 1

¶28

	gn^rqsRi(Tj^^qSr)
aii^g^ilR-li+ ^TOT^n^r^TW	^-saiw^asi^	<til«Iri<Tl-lWltiFll^ (.3><fl<lal«tfl< ^siRmsii^i
	S. B.: HON'BLESHRI PRITINl 08.01.2015:	KER DIWAKER. J
	Shri Vineet Pandey, cou	Shri RahulTamaskar, co
	Challenge in the presen	l 20.11.2014 (Annexure P/1) transferring the petitioner w

r1'

<5L)

XI-HC—78

?SE[ ^iAiid^, yTfl'M<i<,, Rinwy

¶34

WCT ^^.^1^.^...^201

¶35

sn^TiiSR; (T^i^^g)
aii^iqii R-fi* i'iitri4)-i nTOii'?fei<JI <RfWi<
^SiISSR^fitTSI^ -^2-
crart^(^?5h4icb ^iaiRmair^i"
put forth by the petitioner.
Accordingly, the. petitionef is permitted to withdraw this
petitjon with theaforesaid libertk/.^. In the eventuality offiling a
representation by the petitionerl along with copy of this order
before the Collector/responder it No.3 within 10 days from
today, it is expected from the ;ollector to dedde the same
within a further period of four w{teeks after considering all the
aspects ofthecase.
It is made clear that tl|lis Court has not observed
-anything on merits of the ca^e and it would be for the
Collector to decide the represeittation ofthe petitionerstrictly
in accordance with law.
Sd//-
Pritinker Diwaker
Judge

¶36

¶37

¶38

<<br>

Ashok Kumar Kurre v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar Kurre v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Suman Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

R.n. Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt. Vimla Bharadwaj Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

M.r. Koshle and Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

J.P.Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ramjatan Sahu Vs South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and Ors.