Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition under Article 226. The court allowed the application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i wwlaMama
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHATBILASI’U
’7/ WRIT PETITION s No. 9 /2012
PETITIONER Ramjatan Sahu,
‘a‘g \ W w. “/0 Late Shri Dhanupdhari Sahu, LLFWZVAgedabout47 years, l ‘.“.?\9.£~;;$\mC$ ...... w£$
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS 1. (fSouth Eastern Coalfields Limited, through Chairman-cum-Managing Director, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) ”Director 2. (Personnel), South EaStem Coalfields Limited, SeepatRoad,Bilaspur (CG)
' (/Geneml 3. Manager (Personnel Administration), South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) (f 4. Chief General Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, ChirmiriArea,District- Korea (C.G.) 5. Sub-Area Manager, South Eastern ,‘ Coalfields Limited, North Chirmiri, District— Korea (CG) 6. Personnel Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, North Chirmiri Colliery, District— Korea (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
The petitioner is a citizenofIndiaandisthe permanentresidentof the above address.HisconstitutionalrightsasenshrinedinPart-III of the Constitution of Indiaare guaranteed.
m m wwwm
tm‘\ ‘
mum m..Hf..L$J...‘.Z7..l.i....m201 ‘2;
| mmugfgwm | |
|---|---|
| mmwm - |
mm w®gm %aimm |
| } S. B,: HON’BLE SHRI PRITINKER DI 08.01.2015 |
WAKER J . |
| Shri Anmoi'Sharma under the a‘ counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sudhir Bajpai, counsel fort petition. Heard on l.A. No. O1, applicatio i%r the reasons mentioned in petitioner is permitted to withdraw this Accordingly‘ the petition is dismi‘ |
thority of Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, e respondents. ’ seeking permission to withdraw this he application, it is- allowed and the etition‘ sed as withdrawn. . Sdl— yr'tt‘mker Judge mwaka" |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the writ petition.
Ramjatan Sahu
South Eastern Coalfields Limited
Shri Pr tink
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
