Dismissed

Smt. Vimla Bharadwaj v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC7 Jan 2015WPS/4/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge dismissed a writ petition challenging termination of petitioner services as an Aanganbadi worker. Court directed petitioner to exhaust alternative remedy via Collector before entertaining filing or interim relief.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed with direction to approach Collector for alternative remedy within two weeks; liberty granted to file interim relief application.

Smt. Vimla Bharadwaj Vs State Of Chhattisgarh… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶2

WRIT PETITION (S) N0. -4 OF 201C

¶3

PETITIONER

¶4

^..^^
^^;>-'
^y:'.^.
^'it.'<br><\v
^

¶5

Smt. Vimla Bharadwaj b3/o Duryodhan Bharadwaj, aged about 26 years, Occupation - Aganbadi Worker, Aganbadi Center (627) - Pandripani , East^- Uraonpara, Police Station - Chakradhar Nagar, Civil & Revenue Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)

¶6

Versus

¶7

RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhaltisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Assistant Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)

¶8

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTlON OF INDIA

¶9

^g 7

¶10

Xi-HC—78

¶11

3%; •^il<41<7|4|, (?Tn'y'l|<S,I»l<?ll'M1,<

¶12

•o

¶13

3TfTR^.^....X/f/^........^

¶14

||3n^I/q3R; ( ^ijc|iyi<5p)|| |---|---|---| |sn^iqiifeiw
cWTsii^tgww|^CTTSR?i^asn^|'S*<11 <l'Jl'WI<
^siRnsn^i| ||S, B.: HON'BLE SHRIPRITINKfi
07.01.2015:
ShriAwadh Tripathi, couns^
Shri
AV
Shridhar,
R
State/respondents No. 1 to 3.
Challenge in the present
11.12.2014
(Annexure
P/1)
pa{
terminating the services of thej
Aanganbadi Worker.
Learned counsel for the
11.12.2014 the petitioner had d
misfortune on that date itself inj
Assistant Collector and as thel
present on her seat, on. this groit
been terminated. The petitioner|
documents along with this petitio
submission.
State
counsel
submits
alternative remedy under Chhattij
Revisjon) Rules,
1995 and thej
assailed by her before the Collj
petitioner may also file appropr
relief before
the
Collector,
wh|
accordancewitti law.
.
l^

I
d

tt1
I
|R DIWAKER. J.
l
anel

one

id
|i

|ate

forthe petitioner.
Lawyer
for
the
tition is to the order dated
ssed
by respondent
No.4
petitioner on the post of
petitioner submits that on
one to doctor and to her
ipection was made by the
petitioner was not found
alone her services have
|has filed relevant medical
to substantiate the above
at the
petitioner has
an
sgarh Panchayat (Appeal &
order impugned can
be
fector. He submits that the
application for interim
lch
would
be
decided
in|

¶15

..t..—-.J 4^.1t. l^ L.

.•^w-.-

•^t

/' ;,"XtsHCT-'

'3'ed <*i|tii(?t<<, yTfl<i'li<?,

¶20

t; \ '•^'f ?>.

¶21

•s^^j(s...(f./../.^

¶22

3(1^1 T|5[3R ( •{qIyiqSl )

¶23

an^r^ii15-)i<h Wffsn^if^nRi	^giWBliaw^i -2- —	*i4<7i<fl.iKiMtfffl1i?A;(fiReR ^giRmsn^i
	As the petitioner has a statijl remedy under the Chhattisgart	i Revision) Rules, 1995, l am no1

¶24

Smt. Vimla Bharadwaj v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Vimla Bharadwaj v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.K. Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Urmila Dhruv Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Shekhar Kumar Guha and 36 Ors. Vs M.D.Ibp.Co.Ltd.and Ors.

Smt. Suman Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

R.n. Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Jagdish Prasad Shukla Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.