The High Court held that the existence of an alternative remedy does not oust the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to prefer an appeal against the cancellation order.
Petitioner granted time to file an appeal; writ petition allowed on that ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
r
IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
W.P, (S) N0. ^^2- / 2014
PETITIONER
^•:-:::"s^a ^^SiS^
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
4
Gram Panchyat 1.--1 Through Sarpanch Panchyat Bagoud Panchyat Kurud District Dhamtari (C.G) Secretary Gram Bagoud Janpad Panchyat Kurud District Dhamtari (C.G)
WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION O'F INDIA
•<<
'^
"
—^i
^':'XI-HC-
^t'^s^
'3 r''i?rai?ra, yTflwis, Ripii'My
•wrar ^w^'.f^.....°'..'?.0 .^.. A-y. .^r 2 oi
an^iqsR; (ijcfT^id^a)
| sn^igiiR-ii* wiT.yiS^sk'ii* |
®aTWHfi?t3n^ | •kloIpl^ii'SITOBf'S^lAtfa^K ^gK&Hsn^r |
|---|---|---|
| S. B.: HON'BLE SHRI PRITINK 07.01.2015: |
ERDIWAKER.J. | |
| ShriAjayShrivastava, Shri Rahul Tamaskar, coi Par |
fnsel forthe petitioner. fel Lawyerforthe State. |
|
| .1.? | Challenge in thepresen( dated 9.12.2014 (Annexure |
Panchayat-Bagoud, Blpck-1 the appointment order of th^ PanchayatAssistant-cum-Data As per Rule 3 of the & Revision) Rules, 1995there |
f1
<<
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an otherwise available alternative remedy precludes the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226.
Whether the writ petitioner should be afforded an opportunity to file an appeal before the appellate authority.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Suman Sahu
State of Chhattisgarh
S.B. Sridhar
R. D. M. Mirdha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
