R.S. Marabi v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged suspension order, but counsel submitted it was already revoked. Court held petition infructuous and dismissed it.
Petitioner challenged suspension order, but counsel submitted it was already revoked. Court held petition infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 4979 of 2011
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner Shri A.K. Yadav, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Arvind Dubey, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board By
14/07/2015
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Judge
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Nirala
R.S. Marabi
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court