Writ petition challenging the validity of a suspension order declared malafide and arbitrary due to issuance despite insubordination charges within nine months violating the proviso to Rule 9(1)(b).
Quashing of the suspension order dated 21.08.2014 with liberty to the respondents to take fresh decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 4425 of 2014
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri P. K. Bhaduri, GA For respondent No.6 Shri Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board By
14/07/2015
is deemed to be revoked.
Sd/-
JUDGE
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Nirala
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a suspension order passed under Rule 9(1) of the CCA Rules, 1966, is valid when a charge sheet has not been issued within nine months?
Whether the suspension order is liable to be quashed by this Court?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.K.Chauhan
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary
The Engineer In Chief Water Resources Department
Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Kachhar
Executive Engineer E And M Light Machinery
Sub Divisional Officer E And M Light Machinery
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
