Dismissed

Smt. Laxmi Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC13 Jul 2015WPS/1643/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the writ petition regarding termination from a Janpad Panchayat. Finding an alternative remedy available via revision under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993, the court directed the petitioner to file a revision application within 30 days instead of deciding on merits.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to file a revision application within 30 days.

Smt. Laxmi Patel Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors. — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2015)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPS No. 1643 of 2014

¶4

Smt. Laxmi Patel W/o Shri Chetan Kumar Patel, Aged 30 years R/o Village Farswani P.S. & Tahsil Sarangarh, Civil & Revenue Distt. Raigarh C.G.

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (C.G.)

¶8

The Collector Mahasamund, P.S. & P.O. & Tehsil & District Mahasamund (C.G.)

¶9

Janpad Panchayat Saraipali Through the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Janpad Panchayat Saraipali, P.S. & P.O. Saraipali, Tehsil Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund C.G.

¶10

The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Saraipali, P.S. & P.O. & Tehsil Saraipali Distt. Mahasamund C.G.

¶11

---- Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner Mr. R.N. Pusty , Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. P.K. Bhaduri, Government Advocate For Respondents 3 & 4 Mr. A.V. Sridhar, Advocate

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

13/7/2015

¶16

Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

(2) The petitioner is aggrieved by the appellate order passed by the Collector, Mahasamund on 30.12.2013, wherein, the petitioner had assailed the order of termination passed by the Janpad Panchayat, Saraipali on 23.09.2013.

¶18

(3) Admittedly, the order under challenge is revisable under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 read with Rule 5 of the C.G. Panchayat (Appeal and Revesion) Rules, 1995.

¶19

(4) In view of the existence of alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined to deal with the matter on merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event, the petitioner prefers a revision application in accordance with law within a period of 30 days from today, the same shall be considered by the revisional authority on its own merits and decide the same within a period of 6 months after affording opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Judge

¶22

(Prashant Kumar Mishra)

¶23

Shyna

Smt. Laxmi Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Laxmi Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupendra Bahadur Singh Vs State of Chhatisgarh and Ors.

Shiv Kumari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Kalayan Das Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Krishna Kumar Anant Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Prafull Kumar Gupta Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Shakti Soni Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.