Dismissed

Hardeo Traders Pvt.ltd. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC3 Dec 2014WPT/183/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge dismissed a Writ Petition for Judicial Review filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution. The court discharged the petition as the underlying revision application was pending but issued a direction to the respondent Deputy Commissioner to expedite disposal.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No. 4 to take up and dispose of the pending revision application on merits within a reasonable time.

Hardeo Traders Pvt.ltd. Vs State Of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG‘ARH AT BILASPUR

¶2

WRIT PETITION (T) No./3 of 2014

¶3

PETITIONER

¶4

\ y
3A
\Iw

¶5

HARDEO TRADERS^PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR ARJUN TAYAL S/o SHRI

¶6

SHAMBHURAM TAYAL

¶7

R/O CHRISTAL ORCHADE, SHANKAR NAGAR, RAIPUR (C.G.).

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS 1.

STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLAINNG DEPARTMENT (COMMERCIAL^{TAXDEPARTMENT)} MANTRALAYA, MAHANADI^BHAWAN, NAYA RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH).

¶13

THE COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH (VANIJYA^{KARBHAWAN),SOUTHCIVIL} LINES, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) COMMERCIAL TAX^{OFFICER,CIRCLE-II,} COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH (VANIJYA^{KARBHAWAN),SOUTHCIVIL} LINES, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH)

¶14

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,^{DIVISION—2,} COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH (VANIJYA^{KARBHAWAN),SOUTHCIVIL} LINES, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH)

Cotnd

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION \ OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI \ MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR \ WRITS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS ORDER OR ORDERS. N

¶19

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH,^BILASPUR

¶20

W.P. (T) No. 183 of²⁰¹⁴

¶21

PETITIONER

¶22

Hardeo Traders Pvt. Ltd.

¶23

Versus

¶24

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh^and Others

¶25

Shri Moolchand Jain,^{counselforthe} petitioner. Shri Adhiraj Surana,^{Dy.Govt.AdvocatefortheState.}

¶26

SINGLE BENCH HON’BLE SHRI^{PRASHANTKUMARMISHRA,J.}

¶27

; ioners revision appiication^filedbeforet he y Commissioner. Divis i vof Chhattisgarh chall e d ated 09/07/2014 passed by Commercial Tax Offi c . a ipur, is pending consideration, however, the matter^isnot fi i ng.

¶28

Since petitione ri ation is pending, two parallel cannot be Therefore, the writ petition is proceedings t dismissed, however,^{respondentNo.4} — Deputy Commissioner, Division —2, Commercial Tax Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh is directed to^take up the pending revision application^filedbythe petitioner^{attheearliest} and diSpose the same 0“ merits, in accordance with law, within a reasonable time.

¶29

Sd/— Prashant^Kumar Mishra /r Judge /

Hardeo Traders Pvt.ltd. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hardeo Traders Pvt.ltd. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veer Singh Bagi and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Janpad Panchayat Bhaiyathan Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Mahesh Kumar Singh And Ors. Vs Lafarg India Private Limited And Anr.

Anuj Kumar Bhargav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Khagendra Manhar Vs Ramji Kurrey and Ors.

Prakash Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.