Allowed

Mahesh Kumar Singh And Ors. v. Lafarg India Private Limited And Anr.

Chhattisgarh HC2 Dec 2014MCC/258/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This application sought restoration of W.P.(227) No.737/2013, which had been dismissed for non-compliance of court ccy. The High Court allowed the restoration application and restored the writ petition to its original number.

What did the court decide?

Application for restoration of W.P.(227) No.737/2013 allowed; the writ petition restored to its original number and order dated 28/10/2013 recalled.

Mahesh Kumar Singh And Ors. Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

m,a

¶2

awe Eawl @

¶3

@g.
IN THéIHON’BLE HIGH QOURT CHHATTISGARH
AT BILASPUR

¶4

_M.C.C.NO. Q53 [2014

¶5

ARISING OUT OF W.P. (227] No. 737 /2013

¶6

APPLICANTS l . Mahesh Kumar Singh S/o PETITIONERS /V Shripal Singh, aged about 47 years, R/o Amora, P.S. Akaltara, Civil and Revenue District — Janjgir-Champa . (c.G.).

¶7

¶8

N‘Vg‘a Harihar Singh S/o Shatrughan /^Singh, aged about 55 years,

¶9

R/o Gopalpur, P.S. Pamgarh, Civil and Revenue District — Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Laleshwar Tiwari S / o Rambhachan Tiwari, aged about 46 years, R/o Gopalpur, P.S. Pamgarh, Civil and Revenue District — Janjgir— Champa (C.G.)

¶10

Guha Singh S/o Trilok Singh, aged about 56 years, R/o Amora, P.S. Akaltara, Civil and Revenue District — JanjgirChampa (C.G.)

¶11

Umashankar Giri S/o Late

¶12

aw”^S.K.Giri, aged about 54 years, R/o HIG-152, Ayodhya Nagar, Sector—1, Bhopal, P.S. Bhopal, Civil and Revenue District — Bhopal (M.P.)

¶13

9‘ {r

¶14

Smt. Prabha Chandrakar Widow of Late Balmiki Chandrakar, aged about 52 years,^R/oParsada, Gopalpur, P.S. Pamgarh, Civil and Revenue District — JanjgirChampa (C.G.)

¶15

.i was i W ._ l.

¶16

A t 1

¶17

Smt. Archana Goswami Wife of

¶18

¶19

Laxmi Giri Goswami, aged about 54 years, R/o Parsada, Gopalpur, P.S. Pamgarh, Civil and Revenue District^— Janjgir— Chalnpa (C.G.)

¶20

VERSUS

¶21

NON-APPLICANTS : 1‘. Lafarg India Private Limited, RESPONDENTS' / Arasmenta Cement Plant, P.O. Gopal Nagar, District Janjgir— Champa (C.Gv.).

¶22

Member Judge, Industrial K’ Court, Bhopal, Bhopal Bench, Bhopal.

¶23

¶24

APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF w.P. (227) No.

¶25

737/2013

¶26

‘ wmm		W“ @?%1§11 %ai&mané$ W %
	S B Hon‘ble Shri Justice Prashan ” 02.122014 Shri J.K. Shastri, counsel ^ft Heard. ILA. No. 1. This is an application ^for c M.C.C.	tKumar Mishra )r the applicants. andonation of delay in ^filing the
	it is ordered, as prayed ^for.“ M.C.C. No.258 of 2014. This is an applicatio‘n f0! [737/2003 which was “dismissed order dated 28/10/2013. On due consideration anc the restotation application, this M The order dated 28/10/201 W.P.(227) No. 737/2003 is l	tfot the reasons mentioned in resoration 'o W.P.(227) No. ’ for non-compliance of Court C.C. is allowed. 4 is recalled. restored to its original number. t t
		Sdl- Prashant ^{Kumar Mishra} Judge ‘

Mahesh Kumar Singh And Ors. v. Lafarg India Private Limited And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Kumar Singh And Ors. v. Lafarg India Private Limited And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Derha Ram Sahu Vs Bhalan Sahu And Ors.

Lekhram Nayak Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Jai Prakash Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Veer Singh Bagi and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Janpad Panchayat Bhaiyathan Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Shivkumar and Ors. Vs Smt. Savitri Devi and Anr.