PET!TIONER Khagendra Manhar
RESPONDE N
e Bench : Hon'blg
Present :- Shri Rajeev B ha
Shri RS Patel, c
Shri S. Rathore,
(Passed o
1. WP(227) No.283/201 4 d by the plaintiffs under Article
227 of the Constitution ..... are aggrieved by impugned order
passed by the trial CoumiWem to impiead Am Bai, Lakhan &
Ram Kumar as party in the suit.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the said parties
have no right, title or interest in the suit property, therefore, they are not
necessary parties.
3. Pleadings made by the parties would indicate that one Muniram, soniot
Dhansai had four daughters namely; Bodhkunwar, Bawain Bat, Am Bai
‘
and Nem Bai. Bodhkunwar was the mother of the plaintiffs, whereas
defendant Khagendra is the son of Nem Bai. Out of two other sisters
namely; Bawain Bai &Am Bai, Bawain Bai has died leaving Lakhan Lal,
& Ram Kumar, whereas Am Bai is alive. ln this view of the matter, the
trial Court has directed the plaintiffs to join Am Bai and two sons of
Bawain Bai as party. Plaintiffs as well as defendants speak about
partition. As per the plaintiffs, two other sisters had relinquished their
l
