The High Court dismissed a review petition filed against a writ court order as the matter was no longer pressing.
Review Petition No. 42 of 2009 dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W WWMWWWWWW“WwWWVWWwWWWW0WwM mmwmwwwmmw
A mmmw wuw‘wmmmwmf‘m
cgwF
BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH ) \ wwmgmmh Review Petition No. 127 L [2009
PETITIONER
Anil Kumar Parate, S/o Shri Pandari Sitaram Parate. aged about 38 year’s, R/o Quarter No. 17— F, Street No. 26, Sector—- 4, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.)
Versus
APPLICATIO N FOR REVIEW OF THE ORDER DATED 23.03.2009 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE COURT OF MY LORD JUSTICE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRAJI lN W.P.(Cl No..5443l2006
Ww w mm. MW mm m wwww
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR
Division Bench : Hon’bie Shn’ Sun“ Kumar Sinha & Hon”ble Shri RN. Chandrakar, JJ.
Review Petition No. 42 of 2009
Petitioner
Anil Kumar Parate
Vs.
Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh and other.
Application for review the order dated 23.03.2009
Present:
Mr. Ajay Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. T.K. Tiwari. Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R.K. Mishra, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents 1 and 2. Mr. Shaiiendra Shukla, Advocate for respondent No.3
ORDER
(04.12.2013)
SdlSunilKumarSinha Sdl— Judge RangnathChandrakar Judge
Anil Kumar Parate
State of Chhattisgarh
Deputy Corrector, Durg
Bhilai Steel Plant
Sunil Kumar Sinha
Rangnath Chandrakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
