An appeal under the Family Court Act was dismissed because the appellant's counsel informed the court that the appeal was not being pressed and requested it to be dismissed.
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
s
.....:^^J-
^^
^ ^.^
^^.^•••"
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT
BILASPUR
M.A^3 /Q6
APPLELIANT
.Shailesh Kumar Baghel, S/o Sri. Samagit Singh Baghel
APPLICANT
Occupation:- Govemment Service, Forest Ranger.,
Range Officer, Lamni (Territorial) Distt:- Bilaspur,
Chhattisgrah,
Address for Postal purpose : 22, Shanti Nagar, P.0.
Mangla, Bilaspur, Distt:- Bilaspur
C/o Sri. L.S.Sahu ,behind Sector -6, Baleo T/S, Korba.
Versus
RESPONDENT:
Babita Smgh @ Dolly Singh, D/o Late Surajpal Singh,
Non-appl icant C/o Rakeshpal Singh, S/o Netrapal Smgh,
R/o Barapather, Seoni, Distt :- Seoni ( M.P.)
^i
^< APPEAL UNDER SECTICW 19( 1 ) OF HONOURABLE
FAMILY COtJRT ACT
^3
H16H COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BSLASPUR
Division Bench : Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri R.SM. Chandrakar. JJ.
M.ANo.S03of2006
AppeJlant
ShaiSesh Kumar Baghel
Vs.
Respondent Babita Singh @ DolEy Singh
Aepeal under Section 19 (11 of the Familv Court Act
Present:
Mr. Rajnish Singh Baghel, Advocate for the Appellant. None for the respondent.
ORDER
(04.122013)
Sd/Sd/SunilKumarSinha R.N. Chandrakar Judge Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act should be disposed of as it is not pressed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shailesh Kumar Baghel
Babita Singh @ Dolly Singh
Sunil Kumar Sinha
R.S.M. Chandrakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
