The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in Review Petition No. 41/2010, granted permission to the counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the petition. The review petition was accordingly dismissed.
Permission to withdraw the review petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l^-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
AT BILASPUR
REVIEW PETITION. N0. /2010
PETITIONER
,oA-y j^
.i^y
N°'^"-..d<
<•-' ^ .--lo'
A' ..••O
A- ^^ s'<<; •sS'' i'-O..^>*
^
l.^., Rupesh Kumar Pal, .S/o. Shri Mohan Lal Pal, aged about 24 years, Working as - Sub Engineer, Rural Engineering Services .Janpad Panchayat, (Office of Chief Executive OfKcer) Dondilohara Block, District Durg (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS 1)
2)
.?t* .'*"'
State of Chhattisgarh through : Secretary, Department of Panchayat and rural developnaent D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)
The Additional Secretary, Department of Panchayat and rural Developinent, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipiir (C.G.)
3)
Chhattisgarh Rural Developinent Authority through: Chief Executive Officer, Dondilohara, District Durg (C.G.)
4)
Superintendent Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Grain Sadak Yojna OfGce of Vikas Ayukta, Raipur (C.G.)
1 s^^-
•
^f The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dondilohara, District Durg (C.G.)
APPLICATION UWDER SECTION 114 OF THB CODB OF CTVIL PROCEDURB FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DATED 9.12.2009 PASSED IN W.P.fSl N0. 4455/2009 BY THE SINGLE BENCH OF TfflS HON'BLE HIGH COURT PRESIDED OVER BY HON'BLB JUSTICE SHRI SATISH
K. AGMHOTRI. (AMWEXURE P/11
-fc.
<1
'."i
'^ •":•'^
^
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
D.B.: HON'BLEMR.SUNILKUMARSINHA& HON'BLE MR. RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR. JJ.
REVIEW PETITION N0. 41/2010
PETITIONER
Rupesh Kumar Pal
Versus
RESPONDENTS
State of Chhattisgarh and others
(APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURB
Appearance:
Mr. B.P. Banjare, Advocate for the review petitioner. Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. Advocate General for the State.
ORDER
(3rd of December, 2013)
Per Sunil Kumar Sinha. J.
Sd/-
Anu
Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge
Sd/-
R.N. Chandrakar Judge
'l.
"^^-%dliS*'*Wl
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rupesh Kumar Pal
State of Chhattisgarh and others
Sunil Kumar Sinha
Rangnath Chandrakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
