High Court dismissed the application for restoration of a writ petition for want of prosecution as the applicant was unrepresented in two rounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f-
Z-'^ ^h
(2)^
Before Hon'ble HiahCourt of Chhattisgarh at Bilasjiyr
M.C.C. -^^ liSoO&^ •^3G-i'3^w
APPELLANT
P. L. Gautam
-'rt i^^.'r'r ^y:'" ' c. jyLs
V. ^•-'s^>^'
Ws;'"'
Aged about 50 years, Work Assistant, S/o Late Shri P. R. Gautam, Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. P.No. 43442, H.S.C.L. QfRce, Bhilai Q.No. 96 B.H.C.L. Colony, Ruwabandha Sector,
Bhilai, Tahsil and Distit. Durg (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS: 1. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd.
(A Govt. undertaking) Through the Managing Director, 5/1, Commission Rate Road, Hastings Kolkata 700022. ,
Tahsil and Distt. Durg (C.G.)
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd.
3.
/€^%^
^/ ^-7^
! *' s s.ja,^^jjg, j ^.
'<:;-x ^—''^^'~/.
,C6'pTfttf.e>^
Selum Steel Plant, Selum 636012 Tamilnadu
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF
W.P. N0. 4828/2005 /-
*<;;
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
D.8.: HON'BLEMR.SUNILKUMARSINHA& HON'BLE MR. RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR. JJ.
M.C.C.No.504/2013
APPLICANT
P.L. Gautam
Versus
RESPONDENTS Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. and others
(APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.NO.4828/2005)
y
Appearance:
None for the applicant.
None for the respondents.
ORDER
-'
SUNIL-KUMARSINHA.J.
(03.12.2013)
i'
M.C.C. for want of prosecution.
prosecution.
Sd/-
Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge
Sd/-
R.N. Chandrakar Judge
sunita
P. L. Gautam
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd.
Sunil Kumar Sinha
Rangnath Chandrakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
