Disposed

Sanjay Kumar Baghel and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC3 Sept 2012WPS/947/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 regarding Caste Scrutiny Committee proceedings. The court directed final disposal after submission of representation in proforma, ordered committee to act within three weeks, and allowed petitioners to continue service pending decision.

What did the court decide?

Petition finally disposed off with direction to respondents to submit representation in proforma within three weeks; petitioners allowed to continue in service till decision by Committee.

Sanjay Kumar Baghel and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh… — Caste Atrocities | Chhattisgarh HC (2012)

HON ‘ BLE S. B.

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WRIT PETITION S No. j 2012

¶6

PETITIONERS: 1.

¶7

Sanjay Kumar Baghel, S/o Shri J.S. Baghel, Aged about 38 years, Caste Mahara,

¶8

<R/o Mother Teresa Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G.

¶9

Khemeshwer Kumar Baghel, S/o Shri Jhilkuram cyr’ KE70@hel,^Agedabout32 years,^CasteMahara, Village & Post Badekilepai, Block & Tahsil "' Bastanar, District Bastar, C.G. all? if ' , r ';e¢v-‘^'..'.... w” 3. ¢/^{’</sup> @shottam^{Bais,S/oLateShriLachl'iuBais,} ‘ \ w“:‘^w av ¢t AgedR/o Villageabout &33Postyears,Postyears,^— Raikot,Caste TahsilMahara,Tokapal,Tokapal, 1 water“ District Bastar, C.G.}

¶10

@shottam^{Bais,S/oLateShriLachl'iuBais,} AgedR/o about 33Postyears,years, Caste Mahara,Tokapal, R/o Villageabout &33Postyears,Postyears,^— Raikot,Caste TahsilMahara,Tokapal,Tokapal, District Bastar, C.G.

¶11

Smt Manima Bais W/o Shri Purusottam Bais, /Aged about 3O years, Caste Mahara, .R/o Village & Post^— Raikot, Tahsil Tokapal, District Bastar, C.G.

¶12

Ku. Rinki, D/o Shri S. Mada. Shwami, fAged about 28 years, Caste Mahara, R/o Sadakpara, Tokapal, District Bastar, C.G.

¶13

VERSUS

¶14

¶15

RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Ministry, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, C.G. N The Collector, District Bastar, Jagdalpur, C.G. Lda The Director, Caste Scrutiny Committee, District Bastar, Jagdalpur, C.G. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Bastar, Jagdalpur, C.G. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. \ 6. The Chiel Fxeuitive Officer Janpad Panchayat Bastanar District Bastar, C G 7. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Punchay^it Iokapal District Bastar, C G

¶16

¶17

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

¶18

a»

¶19

	W5 a! .3; WF@)M anewm (We	%7'L lK 2“ !)
H241 ^c a".m	matafaaamt	metamasha feetW aarmmay
'	Q1 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, c Though the petition is application for amendment, the the parties. The grievance of the pe that the Caste Scrutiny Comm t , SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Moha 03-09-2012 Shri Alok Dewangan, cou Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy	ounsel for. respondents 5 ta 7. Irsted for admission and consideration of petition is heard finaliy withthe cmsent of oner as ventiiated through this petition is ee is not taking up their matter probabty i nShrivasgava, J. ‘sei forthe petitioners. dvocate Genera! for respondents 1, 2 and
	because of some dispute be Government. Shri Thakur, Deputy Advo 3 submits that if the petitioner before the Caste Scrutiny C decide their cases in accordanc in view of the above, in would be expedient to flnally di case, the petitioners approacht of three weeks from today, prof and the petitioners shali sub proforma ^{within a} period of thr proforma. ^{The Committee shali} necessary enquiry shali take app o	een the State Government and Central ate General appearing for respondents 1 to submit representation in proper proforma ttee, the Caste. Scrutiny Committee shall with law. tead of proceeding further in the matter, it pose off the petition with a direction that in e Caste Scrutiny Committee ’wtthina period rma of appiication shali be suppiied to them mit necessary information in prescribed ee weeks from the date of receipt of the ^{take up their matters thereafter and} atter ropriate decisioninthatregard. i

¶20

¶21

.
/,"
’7‘“?
20
é) «w. wW/a m

¶22

an?“ W (W)

¶23

m? 11m??? § fg‘a W
WW an??? ,_ q r a: mm mam
As the petitioners are still continuing in service, i‘t is directed that tili
the matter is decided by the Crimmittee, the petitioners shali be aiiowed
-
continuein service.
With the aforesaid obsen/ptions, the petition is finaiiy disposed
off.
Sci/-
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Judge
Deapii

Sanjay Kumar Baghel and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar Baghel and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Mainmati Bai and Others Vs Ramesh Sharma and Others

Rang Nath Soni Vs Omprakash Soni and Others

Bhojram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashwini Kumar Netam and Ors. Vs the State of C.G.and Ors.

Sohan Lal Tikariha Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Dharmveer Singh Dhruw Vs State Of C.g. and Ors.