The appellate court allowed the criminal appeal following a private settlement between the appellant and victims under Section 320 CrPC, ordering the acquittal of the appellant and refund of fines.
Appellant acquitted; fine refunded as issued to the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT
BILASPURfC.e.)
Criminal Appeal No. 8^ ^- of 2011
APPELLANT
APPELLANT Bhojram S/o Setram, aged about 52 years,Occupation-Agriculturist,R/o (In Jail) Pandn'pani, Police Station-Kharsia, d-^....-K-••^""^.JW£/;" District-Raigarh (C.G.) r.a.'* ' ^...-.--f--^^^^•vnysVERSUS
RESPQNDENT
State of Chhattisgarh,
Through the Station 1-louse Officer, Police Station-Kharsia, DistrictRaigarh (C.6.)
CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374(2) OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE CObE 1973
-BK'--^ 5
reg- .^nqTcS^, tS>ifl'M'i<s, fa^wy
(^
"WKCT shll< <3-.<^i?f^ (^.g^A^5 ^p..................:(.+............................ y..^ ^
| sni^r vss3K Cpf^a | ^t) | |
|---|---|---|
| 3n^i.'?.;f?;iw W 3nS»T •SntVS! |
^raferitf-WRii^feizt^te;?3 v sifgt) sff^i |
|
| LOKAb 01-09^a»12 Shri H. S. Patel, counsel for |
Shri C&mru!Aziz, l^nel Lavif ShrtA K. Naik, counsetfbrt^ The appettant-BhoJram Slo^ SetramandTikaramS/oUdayram ^ Leamed counsel for the pa two \flctims present in the Gourts^ andthebackEffuund, inwhich, the i enterecfintoamicablesettlementwt ftjture. The twu victims present irj submit that in the htere^ ofthe j oordial relattons, theyarewillingtoj In view of the submission f parttes as alsothe parties,who aij parties to compound the oBence^ 320(2) of the Cr.P.C. The com^ acquittal of the appellant as provl Cr.P.C. 1 Accordingly, the ap |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the offense is compoundable and the appeal should be allowed upon the parties reaching a settlement.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhojram S/o Setram
State of Chhattisgarh
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
