Single judge order addressing belated promotion claim under Article 226, directing State to consider promotion and advance due retirement notices.
Direction to respondents to consider promotion and issue retirement/superannuation notices within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cF/wl smw ghm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PErITION (S) No. 7 § 3 2007
PEI'ITIONER
Sohan Lal Tikariha S/o Late Shri L.R. Tikariha, Aged about 57 years,Head Master Middle School, Chabela, R/o Behind Ayurvedic College, Near Gayatri Hospital, Rohanipuram, Raipur (C.G.)
Versus Q RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) f‘ OgY The Assistant Commissioner,vTribal Welfare Department, District Kanker Lg Asmm (C-G-) 'all—i g. GAERKi0 3. The Block Education Officer, Block— Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.)
// WRIT PEFITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA
WWW WaspsWW(W)
| mwW wmm |
mmm | WWW wW |
|---|---|---|
| Shri S. C. Verma, couns Shri Bhaskar Pay State/respondents. Heard. While this petition re petitioner has moved an applic Learned counsel for tn petitioner has entitled to be belatedly promoted in the year juniors were also promoted. submits that as the petitioner December, 2012, in the pecu may be directed to consider th regard to supercassion, which in the writ petition aiso, the res repiy. On the other hand, te the prayer. Accordingly,,this petition a |
Iforthe petitioner, hi, Panel Lawyer for ained pending since 2007, the ion for urgent hearing. _ petitioner submits that though the romoted in the year 1993, he was 998, during which period. number of eamed counsel for the petitioner is oin to retire in the month of ar circumstances, the respondents representation of the petitioner with as not been decided so far, because ndents have not oome out with any State counsel does not oppose s tinaiiy disposed oftwith a direction the |
|
| to respondent No.2 to consider take appropriate decision in the entitied to be given promotion f shall prefer a fresh representati respondent No.2 wili take app retirement ofthe petitioner. |
the grievances ofthe petitioner and matter as to whetherthe petitioner is om year 1993 or not. The petitioner n within 15 days from today and the opriate decision thereon before the ‘W |
|
| Tumane | Sd/— M.M. Shrivastava ' Judge |
|
| mamasansgm,am | newlisn 40—2/201 1—1 ,so,ooo. |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to promotion after belated legal notice.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief against suppression of promotion in 2007.
Sohan Lal Tikariha
The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur
The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, District Kanker
The Block Education Officer, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker
M.M. Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
