Disposed

Dharmveer Singh Dhruw v. State Of C.g. and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC3 Sept 2012WPS/3661/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the High Court observed that offering a petitioner a stopgap contractual appointment does not adversely affect their candidature for the regular selection process already initiated for the post of Scientific Assistant.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner offered choice to accept contractual appointment or await regular selection without affecting candidature.

Dharmveer Singh Dhruw Vs State Of C.g… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2012)

¶1

¶2

¶3

IJLTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, AT - BILASPUR

¶4

W, P, (S) N0, ^E U ^F^012 Sirigi®-LIU^si.-,^ fa^''.,B^ iBar i KBhy^i?3 £

¶5

PIST1TIONER

¶6

DHARMVEER SINGH DHRUW

¶7

AGED - 29 YEARS, S/0 SHRI MANKU RAM DHRUW, R/0 C/0 S. P. THAKUR,

¶8

H.N0.-22,AKASH NAGAR, NEAR GA-VATRI IL NAGAR, SHANKAR NAGAR, 3^ ^w-^ BNo.—•••—•"' P.0.- SHANKAR NAGAR, RAIPUR, ^ ted%atK: s^..'...^9"ls-lj-^' DISTRICT - RAIPUR (C. G.)

¶9

VE RS U S

¶10

RESPONDENTS

¶11

STATE OF CHHATTISGARJI,

¶12

THROUGH - 1TS SECRETARY,

¶13

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTI-1

¶14

AND FAMILY WELFARE,

¶15

D. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR.

¶16

THE CONTROLLER,

¶17

FOOD AND DRUGS ADMINISTRAT10M

¶18

CHHATHSGARH, RAIPUR.

¶19

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTILCE - 226 OF THE

¶20

CONSTITUTION OF INADIA

¶21

Particulars of the petitioner

¶22

As above in cause title.

¶23

Particulars of the respondents :

¶24

As above in cause title.

¶25

_>3'. Particulars ofthe order against which the^•petition

¶26

Made:-

¶27

^€ssss%

¶28

^s&^^ gg|Nff2|lC—78 3-CTT ^-||/-| |0i|, (STfly'lf, plrtiyy ^Sc&^"

¶29

•WTW W^ .L?..p...ffiA..J..^ ^

¶30

ssvSsf ws (

¶31

SII^; ?K Ri-li'* 'BITs':!i?igrqra'	's^nwgfeT•ai^T Wifvl'T^'V^<ff^S <f«lt^l< ^raflwrsni?r
	SB :JHoaTI>tori MantadraMolwn Slirivasta'wi.J. 3.9.2012 Shri R,K. Kesharwani, Shri Y.S, Thakur, Qy. copy. Heard. ttie Leamed counselfor initiated the process of re^ Scieatifie Assistant by iastead ofcoinpletmgfhc respoiidents are offermg th^ lunited period. A perusal of letter petitionerIiasbeenoffered the process of regular department itninediately n^ Therefore, it appears fhat stop gap arraugement». eontractual appoiutmeat, itj regular process ofselection the petitionerhasalready ps^tii Therefore, I am not io

SII^; ?K Ri-li'*
'BITs':!i?igrqra'

's^nwgfeT•ai^T
Wifvl'T^'V^<ff^S <f«lt^l<
^raflwrsni?r

SB :JHoaTI>tori MantadraMolwn Slirivasta'wi.J.
3.9.2012
Shri R,K. Kesharwani,
Shri Y.S, Thakur, Qy.
copy.
Heard.
ttie
Leamed counselfor
initiated the process of re^
Scieatifie Assistant by
iastead ofcoinpletmgfhc
respoiidents are offermg th^
lunited period.
A perusal of letter
petitionerIiasbeenoffered
the process of regular
department itninediately
n^
Therefore, it appears fhat
stop
gap
arraugement».
eontractual appoiutmeat, itj
regular process ofselection
the petitionerhasalready ps^tii
Therefore, I am not io

:ft

^'^

\ !11 I Kt.t1C—7S

3^ET '^W<ftf, fS-^V'fS, Kl^W'y.

¶36

•W^ 20

¶37

Twrar: %Tfl^

¶38

an^r Vifss ( ?J)
sn^y w h-u'h '^t^^T'1^^ 'F{TO^f ^T ^^ i-^K
TRIIWHfe •S1^?f
gqi 5~1^I VW —1. ^sTRms'n^r
It would be opcn for the] petttioner to aocept or not to accept the
contractual appointment pzi^siiant to letter dated l.8.2012. It is,
however, made clear fhat ejven if the petitioner does not aceept
contractual appointment, it |wiU have no effeet or inipact on tris
caadidature for fhe regular a^>poiatment initiated vide
(Annexure P-2).
Wifh fhe aforesaid obsejrvations, fhe petituMi is fiaatty disposcd
off.
Sd/-
Shrivastava
Judge
Prawen

¶39

¶40

'I1
^.

¶41

Dharmveer Singh Dhruw v. State Of C.g. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmveer Singh Dhruw v. State Of C.g. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Mainmati Bai and Others Vs Ramesh Sharma and Others

Rang Nath Soni Vs Omprakash Soni and Others

Bhojram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashwini Kumar Netam and Ors. Vs the State of C.G.and Ors.

Sohan Lal Tikariha Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Baghel and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.