Petitioners seek advance pension increments for teachers; court disposed of petition with direction to respondents to decide the claim as per circular.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-^
IN^THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
AT BILASPUR
s 72010 S8i i^ i^ W.P.(S) N0^
| PETITIONERS | 1. | Smt. Anit | a Dutta Rai, W/o |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shri Shy |
amal Dutta Rai, | ||
| aged ab |
out 47 years, |
||
| Principal, | Govt. Girls High | ||
| School, | Manjhapara, | ||
| Kanker, | Distt. Kanker |
||
| ^(W/ p .* /^/- ^l.^ '^^ |
2. | (C.G.) Pratul Ku |
mar Biswas, S/o |
| .v-yy ^Mf |
Shri Vija | y Kumar Biswas, | |
| ^•^y •V" ~| |
aged ab |
out 45 years, |
|
| iy | Lecturer, | Govt. Girls High | |
| •^ ^ v^ *¥' |
School, | Manjhapara, | |
| Kanker, | Distt. Kanker |
||
| VERS |
(C.G.) US |
||
| RESPONDENTS | : l." | State ofC | hhattisgarh |
| Through : | -The Secretary, | ||
| -:. ^ |
TribalWe | lfare Department, | |
| D.K.S. Bh | awan, Raipiir | ||
| -•- | (C.G.) | ||
| 2. ' | Assistant | Commissioner, | |
| Tribal We | lfare Department, | ||
| Kanker, | Distt. Kanker |
||
| (C.G.) | |||
| 3/ | Treasury | Officer, Treasuiy, | |
| Accounts | and Pension, |
||
| Kanker, | Distt. Kanker |
||
| (C.G.) |
/^; -:.
y csi / ^i xv
' -9 j S.SyKBB^&ik | -^
t^
^s. y '^' -•-
'^^
.V-
d-cc| •<l|<liw<l, ©fll+l'lfi,Is|fl!-y^< ...^f.;..^.....^....ri2?f^
an^r^raw (^f^s?)
| 3?l4?IqiTf^'fe WT 3TTt?T^rqt^i' |
TOnw^ftHan^fi | <*il<i(?l<fl-f tfWdl''?fs^S •^? 3TRPTan^t |
|---|---|---|
| SB : HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRa 04.10.2010 ShriSonikantVenna, ShriPraveen Das, Dy. Q c petitio Counsel for the are entitled to benefit oftwo theyhavingpassed B.Ed. exa^ at theirown cost. It is submil present petition is no longer ^ finatly decided by the Hon'b^ Asha Saxena Vs. State of M 59. :a |
TINKBRDIWAKER dunsel 4crs ferthepctitioners. A. forthe State, subinits tiiat the pctitioncrs (dvance iacreiuents on account of ^am.ation before ttieirappoiatment Eted that the issue iavolved ia the ^s infegraand fhe same has been Supreme Court ia ffae case of (.P. & Ors. 2009 (IIIJMPJR (SC |
|
| It is further submitted sinular view in its order datei 6257/2008. Counselforfhe p order dated 29.4.2010 passe iu another Writ Appeal No. whereinrelying uponthejud^ case ofAsha Saxena (supra) ^ Couaselforthe State would alsobc ooiisiderecl on issued for consideration of t. |
iocrements as per ciTcular daj ofMadhya PTadesh, aftervert petition. si^ m |
XI-HC—78
^ST •<ii<4i<iq,8)-niy'i<o, fs|diy^<
..^:.ff..:.C^...G^....^. 1°
sil^'nira^ (yif^'5)'^)
| OT^T^iT R(-li+ (ni3Ut?TWqH? |
'reirw^HfroOT^r | ^I^^'T'IHR^ff^'f^^S'<F^K ^atRrasn^; |
|---|---|---|
| In view of above, the directionto the respondent petitioners for graat oftwo dated 21.9.1974 issued by th( verificationoffhefactspleade^ e^htweeks frouitoday. ault ad |
Ipetition is disposed of wifh a horities todecide theclauuofthe ^ance increments as per circular State of Madhya Pradesh after inthepetitionwittunapenod of Sd/- pritinkerDiwakar Judge |
Smt. Anit a Dutta Rai
Shri Shyamal Dutta Rai
C.G. Pratul Kumar Biswas
State of Chhattisgarh
Shri Sonikant Venna
Shri Praveen Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
