The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition after directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to Respondent No. 2 within three weeks for a decision in accordance with law.
Direction issued for deciding the representation so made in accordance with law; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
....^'i
QD
c<: ?®& ,^......
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (St N0. l^69> OF 2009
PETITIONER
Basant Kumar Yadav, S/o Late Shri Ramesh Yadav, aged about 22 years, Ward No.2, Fhooljhariya Para, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG).
Versus
RESPONDENTS 1. Chhattisgarh State Electricity 7,^ Board, Danganiya, Raipur, through its Secretary. ^^N ^^^ 2. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). ^^ 3. Executive Engineer (STRI), Construction Sub Division, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Ambikapur, District Sarguja(CG). ^^M"^ '^. r Assistant Engineer (Construction ^"(^y.SJ Sub Division), Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG).
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR
(Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker)
Writ Petition (S) No. 1268 of2009
PETITIONER
Basant Kumar Yadav
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board and others
Shri U.R. Koshley counsel for the petitioner. Shri Brajesh Singh on behalf of Shri A.S. Gaharwar counsel for the respondents.
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TME
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
ORDER
(01.10.2010)
Looking to the point involved in this writ petition counsel for the respondents submits that let the petitioner makea fresh representation beforerespondent No.2 and the same would be decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner being in agreement with the proposition of the counsel for the respondents submits that let a direction may be issued for deciding the representation so madein accordance with law and in that event he may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. If the petitioner makes a representation before respondent No.2 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expected to be decided in accordance with law. F
Sd/Pritinker Diwaker Judge
•f^
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Basant Kumar Yadav
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
