High Court directed petitioner to file fresh representation regarding unpaid salary arrears and issued notice to respondents for appropriate order within three weeks without deciding on merits.
Petitioner directed to file fresh representation; respondents directed to decide representation and order salary payment within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
iMffii F RFKKH ilillaLC0E:ri'i.-i>
^pt<^^
IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURTOF^HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^LRITPETITIOIUSLNO^ ^g6 QF 2010
PETITIONER:
Savita Jaiswal; W/o Shri Pradeep Jaiswal, aged about 35 years, R/o Village and TahsilWadrafnagar, District -Surguja ,(C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS:
RESPONDENTS: y 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through, Secretary o ..••' Panchayat,Department,D.K.S. f^-^^ Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^'•.^y 2. The Collector ^^y ..;<c^ ''•.x'^ n^'v Surguja (C.G.) ?•'•' f: 3. Chief Executive Officer, <y~ v>v Zila Panchayat Surguja, - Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G). ,/ 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat,Wadarfnagar , District Surguja, (C.G). &i.'<?S'to^Si*» x>^,^*/ ^f '%syf 'sys'"^' ^ 5. R.S.Sengar, -^g^fS^^' Incharge Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat,Wadarfnagar, District Surguja, (C.G).
WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER
-^i-^uS&i
•s
'^^ "<^
!\°
^"^ -^ww^, '&^w1is, 'fsTaray
.U:.£:.^).....!'^.'S^<ii^.
| aii^ftraqT(1pf3^q) |
|---|
| sn^i^i foi'sh WIi 311^1WRW |
sbwfd'iil-fiwrcff*'ft^^R?R ^3lfWT3II^[ |
|---|---|
| •s' <." | SB : HON'BLEMR. JUSTICE PRlft-m'KERDIWAKBR 04.10.2010 ShriA.K.Yadav, counsel foil ShriVaibhavGoverdhan, PJ State counsel submits th^ representation to the resps. 3 8s pass appropriate order for the paj accordancewith law. In view of the above, tl] petitioner is directed to file fresh from the date ofreceipt ofcopyol the petitioner. L. forthe State. At the' outset it has be^n submitted by counsel for the petitioner that he is not pressin^.tbe reliefs 10.1, 10.2 & 10.3. He however submits that the petitio^jier has not been paid saiaiy since January2010 and isfacingfinancjial hardship. it let the petitioner make a fresh 4 and the said respondents would yment of salary of the petitioner in le petitioner t8 disposed of. The representation within three weeks this order and in tum the resps. 3 8s 4 are directed to pass appropri^te order in respect ofthe payment of salary to the petitioner with a |
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to salary arrears after September 2009 due to non-payment since January 2010.
Whether the appropriate state authorities should be directed to pass an order on the petitioner's representation regarding salary payment.
Whether the court should express an opinion on the merits while directing authorities to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Savita Jaiswal
State of Chhattisgarh
The Collector, Surguja
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surguja
Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Wadarfnagar
R.S.Sengar
Pradeep K.Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
