The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal allowed the petitioner's application, setting aside an impugned order and holding him entitled to salary for the entire period he performed duties at Sarangarh despite a different statement in the return.
Order impugned set aside; petitioner held entitled to salary for the entire period performing duties at Sarangarh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
N’vrz‘AV 15?
f7 .)
sxkk
’A/xqE/u DEM?
fi: TIT/0.!“
BEFORE THE MADHYA PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCHI BHOPAL‘.
W.P. (S! 2271(2005
APPLICANT
Vijay Shankar Yadav, aged about 50 years, S/o Shri Heera Lal Yadav, Occupation Patwari, Tahsil Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh
V E R S U S
RESPONDENTS : The (State of Chhattisgarh , L9 “ ‘ Through the Secretary Govt. é“lw}4vfff«;] Of Chhattisgarh, Revenue ' @wate Department Mantralaya, r“ > D.K.s. Bhawan Raipur c.G. kt' a?)W‘a i wagfr/ APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AQT. 19§5.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) .‘ Writ Petition (S) No. 2271 of 2005
Vijay Shankar Yadav
V\ERS_U§
RESPONDENTS \
1 issue framed by the court
To determine the entitlement of the petitioner for salary during the period he performed his duties at Sarangarh.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Shankar Yadav
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
