This order dismisses a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite summons despite the court fixing a second round of hearing.
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ZN_£HE_Hia4 CQUHr OF JUDIC.ArUBE AT JABAl£Ua
^o/ ./ 1999.
mil PETI'riON N0«
M/s. Durga Tobacco Products, Songargarb, District Hajnandgaon, through Its partner Nstwarbhai Chbotabhai Patel, aged 57 years, r/o Dantesbwari Ward, Dongargarb, District liajnandgaon^ MoP,
Peti.ti.oner
"'T
v_E,a,s_u_s
Hespondents
.2^
L^. ^ />
CL^-
^
!;' ^3~;{
Cont*d..,02.
/•
^
<>
•^-
:: 02 :: 18. Mathura Bai, Nathuram Sahare, t9* Kiran Bai, Tilak JambuLkar, 20, Kalpana Bai, Kailash Sahare, 2i/ Xejram^ Premlal Tembulkar, 22. Meera Bai, Ashoklffi^bade, 23. Ranjana Bai., Bhaudas Sahare, 24. Yamuna Bai., Hagroo Sahare, 25. Vmla Bal, Indurantake, 26. Hayabai, Kutubuddin MussaLman, 27. Anita Bai, ishwardas Yemburkar, 28. Pushpa Bai, Vtsbal Yadav, 29* Prabha Bai, Hari.ram Meshran, 30. Panchphool, Hlbru, 3i* Anandrao, Lakba Meshram;, 32. Ksla Bai, Kajendra Bhave, 33. Roopkala Bai, Hajendra Kumar Shyam Kumar, 34. Katna Bai, Nonare, 35. Namdeo Sahare, Sitaram Sahare, 36. Hlrakana Bai, 37. Anita Bai, Pandurang;Nasnik, 38. Usha Bsi, Rajendra Meshram, 39. Parbata Bai, Roopchand Sahare, 40. Chitrarekha, Santosh Sahare, 41. Varsha Bal, Santosh Sahare,
Note : .Bespondents No»4 to 41 are under C/o Namdeo Sahare, Labourers, Bhlmnagar, Ward No«7, Dongargarhy Bajnandgaon, M,P<»
^.
Conttd....03.
x
• » • « ^^ 03 <» • • o
PETiriON UNDEH ARIICLE 226/227 OF THE-CONSTmjnON-OF-^-N_D_I,_A^Z
-5)4
.C^ •ll^ y |^y/^? Zo
l-HC—78
-3^r •^i^Kri^, ^xil'y^Ko, fN^TRT^3: H° M_"^l.
^jT^^tT ^HFs^
^T^T TT^? (1?I^^)
| ^n^r^Tf^F ^^TFw^y ^^si<^ |
'^^w^^f^n^? | l^ ^}^<n? "^*fe^Tf^^R '^^RRST?^ |
|---|---|---|
| '^; | 8B : HON'BLBMR. JU8TICE Pltl 05.10.2010 None forthe petitioner (s). Even after tlie matter wa |
none appeared for the peti^i circuinstances, fhis Court has fhe petition forwautofprosecut^o Accordmgly, the petitioiji prosecution. ^ jp |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proceedings for want of prosecution can be dismissed under Article 226 of the Constitution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Durga Tobacco Products
Principal Officer, Labour Court, Rajnandgaon
State of Madhya Pradesh
Buknia Bai
Hm.hhmr Ju8tice Pltl
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
