The writ petition was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the petitioner across two hearing dates, indicating a loss of interest. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.A. 21301 of 2017
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
At the time of call no one appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for. Same situation prevailed on 20th February, 2023.
It appears that petitioner has lost interest. The writ petition stands dismissed. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Ajoy Kumar Roy
The State of West Bengal
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
