Disposed

Gopal Das v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC27 Feb 2023WPA/11466/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that a procedural defect regarding the application form did not justify rejection given the earlier rejection of the mother's application. It directed the petitioner to submit the correct form to get the prayer considered.

What did the court decide?

Direction to submit the application in the prescribed proforma within one month for consideration by the authority.

Gopal Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

47 27.02.2023 (sanjay) Ct 25

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

¶3

WPA 11466 of 2022

¶4

Gopal Das Vs.

¶5

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

Mr. Mukteswar Maity,

¶7

Mr. Diptyendu K. Pal …. For the petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Ms. Tuli Sinha … For the State.

¶9

By an order dated February 15, 2022 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in WPA 130 of 2022 the respondent authorities were directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated November 27, 2018 for compassionate appointment in place and stead of his father.

¶10

The petitioner’s father was an employee of the Irrigation & Waterways Directorate, Government of West Bengal. By the impugned order dated May 5, 2022, the Chief Engineer, Irrigation & Waterways Directorate/ the respondent no.2 rejected the prayer of the petitioner on two grounds. The petitioner’s prayer was rejected since he did not submit the prescribed proforma for compassionate appointment within six months from the date of death of the deceased employee and also that the application of the petitioner dated November 27, 2018 was not in proper form.

¶11

¶12

This Court finds that since the mother of the petitioner made an application for compassionate appointment initially and the same was rejected and thereupon the petitioner made an application and the same was directed to be considered by the Coordinate Bench by the respondent authorities. Therefore, no rejection can be made on the ground that the petitioner failed to make an application within six months in the prescribed proforma from the date of death of the deceased employee.

¶13

Since the only ground agitated by the respondent authorities is that the application has not been made by way of prescribed proforma, this Court is of the view that it is only a procedural defect on the part of the petitioner.

¶14

In the light discussions above, this Court directs that in the event the petitioner makes an application in the prescribed proforma within one month from the date of this order the same shall be considered by the respondent authorities/the respondent no.2 within two months from the date of filing of the application/proforma. The reasoned order is to be passed and communicated to the petitioner within two weeks of passing of the same.

¶15

The petitioner will be at liberty to pray from the department a copy of the prescribed proforma in which applications for compassionate appointment are usually

¶16

¶17

made by the dependants/candidates.

¶18

Since no affidavits have been directed to be exchanged in the said writ petition, all the allegations contained therein, are deemed not to have been admitted by the parties.

¶19

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition, being

¶20

WPA 11466 of 2022 , is disposed of .

¶21

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Hon’ble Court.

¶22

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

¶23

(Lapita Banerji, J.)

Gopal Das v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Das v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Milan Kr Jana Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Md. Subid Ali Vs Samima Sheik and Anr.

Kabiruddin Ahmed Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Madhumita Kundu Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ajoy Kumar Roy Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Rajlaxmi Das Vs Wbbse & Ors.