Holding that a writ petition stood dismissed due to the petitioner's non-prosecution and vacating any interim orders.
Writ petition dismissed on ground of non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.A. 14936 of 2017
CAN 1/ 2020 ( Old CAN 2748 of 2020)
Madhumita Kundu
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Sk. Mansoor Ali … for the petitioner
The writ petition is taken up for consideration pursuant to the order dated 13th February, 2023 when Mr. Ali, learned advocate representing the petitioner has placed before this Court the decision of District Inspector of Schools (SE), Hooghly, dated 14th September, 2017. The same is taken on record.
However, Mr. Ali, has submitted that the petitioner is not willing to proceed with the writ petition.
No one is representing the respondents today.
In view of such submission being made on behalf of the petitioner the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Application, if any, pending also stands dismissed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Madhumita Kundu
The State of West Bengal
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
