The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and Article 215 of the Constitution, as the petitioners were absenu wt
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-09-2022 Item no.17
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.71 of 2001 Sri Rudal Singh & Ors. -vsSri R.K. Thoopal & Ors. arising out of CO.No.20707(W) of 1993
None …for the petitioners
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioners.
The petitioners, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India dated January 16, 2001, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated January 14, 1993 passed by this court in CO No.20707(W) of 1993.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application should be proceeded with in the absence of the petitioners.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Rudal Singh & Ors.
Sri R.K. Thoopal & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
