The court dismissed a contempt application filed under the Contempt of Court's Act, 1971, for the non-appearance of the petitioner, who was found uninterested in proceeding with the matter.
None. The contempt application was dismissed for the non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 23.9 No.
14 2022 11 akb (F.N.H.)
C.P.A.N. 224 of 2000 In W.P. 15324 (W) of 1998 Sahabuddin Ahmed –VersusArun Roy & Ors.
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time
of call.
This is a contempt application under the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner on 1st February, 2000.
The petitioner by filing the instant application, sought for punishment of the contemnors / respondents for violation of the order dated 6th November, 1998 passed by a learned Single Bench in W.P. 15324 (W) of 1998. At the time of filing of the application, the petitioner was aged about 49 years. If he is alive, he is now aged about 71 years. Since the filing of the application, none appeared for the petitioner to press the application.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Sahabuddin Ahmed
Arun Roy & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
