The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and Article 215 of the Constitution of India because the petitioners failed to press it after filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-09-2022 Item no.15
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.22 of 2001 Sm. Mita Rani Nandy & Anr. -vsSri Barith Baran Guha
arising out of WPA No.18769 of 1999
None …for the petitioners
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioners.
The petitioners, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India dated December 18, 2000, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated March 29, 2000 passed by this court in WP No.18769(W) of 1999.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application should be dismissed for non-appearance.
Sm. Mita Rani Nandy & Anr.
Sri Barith Baran Guha
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
