Single judge dismissed a contempt petition under the Contempt of Court's Act, 1971, for the petitioners' non-appearance, noting their apparent lack of interest in proceeding. The case file was marked for tagging with the main file.
Contempt application dismissed due to non-appearance of petitioners; file tagged for further action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 23.9 No.
14 2022 10 akb (F.N.H.)
C.P.A.N. 198 of 2000 In W.P. 2583 (W) of 1998 Sanjoy Adhikary & Anr. –VersusArun Kumar Roy & Ors.
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioners at the time of call.
This is a contempt application under the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners on 28th January, 2000.
The petitioners by filing the instant application, sought for punishment of the contemnors / respondents for violation of the order dated 29th January, 1999 passed by a learned Single Bench in W.P. 2583 (W) of 1998. Since the filing of the application, none appeared for the petitioners to press the application.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Sanjoy Adhikary & Anr.
Arun Kumar Roy & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
