The Criminal Revision application filed by the petitioner in CRR 1249 of 2018 was dismissed due to the petitioner's instruction not to proceed with the revision, resulting in a decision of non-prosecution for the instant matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
05.09. 2022 item No.10 n.b. ct. no. 551
CRR 1249 of 2018
Md. Arshad @ Mohammed Arshad Ali Vs. The State of West Bengal
Ms. Oindrila Ghosh,
…..for the petitioner
Mr. Prasum Kumar Dutta, Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwal, Mr. Pratick Bose
…. For the State.
State is represented.
Ms. Oindrila Ghosh, learned advocate appears on
behalf of the petitioner by filing a fresh power. Let it be kept with the record.
On instruction, Ms. Oindrila Ghosh, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that she has been instructed not to proceed with this criminal revisional application.
Accordingly, the instant criminal revision is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities.
( Subhendu Samanta, J.)
Md. Arshad @ Mohammed Arshad Ali
The State of West Bengal
Subhendu Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
