The petitioner failed to appear when the single-judge bench called for the appeal. The court dismissed the contempt application filed under Article 215 read with the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 due to the petitioner's non-appearance.
Contempt application dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 06.9 C.P.A.N. 1820 of 1999 No. In
14 2022 W.P. 4127 (W) of 1998 5 Shri Subhas Chandra Guha akb (F.N.H.) –VersusShri Arun Kumar Ray
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time
of call.
This is an application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner.
This application was filed on 8th October 1998, when the petitioner, Shri Subhas Chandra Guha was aged about 63 years.
The application was filed seeking punishment of the contemnors / respondents for violation of the order dated 13th November 1998 passed by a learned Single Bench in W.P. 4127 (W) of 1998. Since, filing of the application, none moved the application. The aforesaid circumstances indicate that the petitioner was or is not interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Therefore, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Shri Subhas Chandra Guha
Shri Arun Kumar Ray
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
