A contempt application filed in 2001 regarding non-compliance with a 1999 High Court order was dismissed by a Calcutta HC judge on February 13, 2002, due to lack of assistance from the petitioners.
Contempt application was dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-09-2022 Item no.11
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.205 of 2001 Amiya Bhusan Kundu & Anr.
-vs-
Mr. Broj Kishore Nag Choudhury & Ors.
arising out of WPA No.17178 of 1998
None …for the petitioners
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioners.
The petitioners, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed on February 13, 2001, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated October 5, 1999 passed by this court in WP No.17178(W) of 1998.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application should proceed in the absence of the petitioners.
CPAN No.205 of 2001
Mr. Broj Kishore Nag Choudhury & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
