Single-line order disposing WPA (H) 9 of 2021 after counsel submitted the victim was recovered. Petition disposed, though parties may proceed with available remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09.03.2021 ITEM NO. 25 Ct. No.1 AD & Saswata
WPA (H) 9 of 2021 (Via video conference) Manju Sharma
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Prasenjit Debnath Ms. Punam Basu Mr. Pronoy Basak Ms. Rajashree Tah … for the petitioner Mr. Saibal Bapuli, APP Md. Sabir Ahmed
… for the State
Mr. Supratic Roy
… for respondent nos. 5 & 6
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim has been recovered. He accordingly submits that nothing remains for further consideration.
A report dated 08.02.2021 is presented by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor before us which is taken on record.
Accordingly, WPA (H) 9 of 2021 is disposed of. However, this will not preclude the parties to proceed in accordance with law, if any remedy is available to them on the issue.
(Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, CJ.)
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)
Manju Sharma
The State of West Bengal
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
Aniruddha Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
