The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking adjudication. The court recorded that the victim was recovered and her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., finding no further issue remained to adjudicate, and disposed of the petition.
The writ petition was disposed of as there was nothing further to adjudicate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.03.2021 ITEM NO. 91 Ct. No.1 AD & Saswata
WPA (H) 6 of 2021 (Via video conference)
Ganga Sagar Ram
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Shareq Siddique
… for the petitioner
Mr. Saibal Bapuli, APP Md. Sabir Ahmed
… for the State
The petitioner submits that the victim girl has already been recovered.
Her statement has been recorded in accordance with Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.
The report submitted today dated 25.01.2021 is kept on record.
In view of the above, there remains nothing further to be adjudicated in the writ petition.
Accordingly, WPA (H) 6 of 2021 is disposed of.
(Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, CJ.)
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requires further adjudication after the recovery of the victim and recording of her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganga Sagar Ram
The State of West Bengal
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
Aniruddha Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
