The writ petition was disposed of because the petitioner submitted that the person whose release was sought had been recovered and was free.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(Through Video Conference)
08 .03.2021
Item no. 65
Dd/aloke
WPA (H) 17 of 2021
Smt. Saraswati Panja Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Indrajit Dey, Adv. Mr. Ankan Biswas, Adv. Mr. Kushal Das, Adv. Ms. Jovery Sabbah, Adv. Mr. Akashdeep Mukherjee, Adv. … For the Petitioners
Mr. Kishore Dutta, AG Mr. Rana Mukherjee, APP Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Adv …For the State
Report in the form of affidavit filed by the Commissioner of Police, Kolkata Police, is taken on record.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the person in whose benefit this writ petition was instituted seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus has been recovered and is free.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
[Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, C.J]
[Aniruddha Roy, J.]
Smt. Saraswati Panja
The State of West Bengal
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
Aniruddha Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
