Allowed

Taiyara Khatun @ Tamina Khatun Anb Another v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC9 Apr 2021CRM/719/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kolkata High Court disposed of an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. Noting that the principal accused was arrested and allegations against the petitioner were omnibus, the court granted bail subject to surrender before the Jurisdictional Special Court within four weeks and furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed subject to surrender before the Jurisdictional Special Court within four weeks and furnishing a bond.

Taiyara Khatun @ Tamina Khatun Anb Another Vs State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

09.04.2021 SL No.259 Court No.28 (gc) (Allowed)

¶2

CRM 719 of 2021 (Via video Conference)

¶3

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Jangipara Police Station Case No.8/2021 dated 08.01.2021 under Sections 147/148/149/323/325/304/504/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

And

¶5

In the matter of : Taiyara Khatun @ Tamina Khatun & Anr.

¶6

Petitioners

¶7

Mr. Rafikul Islam Sardar … For the Petitioners. Mr. Ranabir Ray Chowdhury, Mr. Mainak Gupta,

¶8

… For the State. Mr. Sanjoy Ghosh,

¶9

… For the de facto complainant.

¶10

Learned Counsel for the petitioners has fairly submitted that the petitioner No.2 has been arrested during the pendency of this application for anticipatory bail and she has not presented the said application. However, she has prayed for reliefs in respect of the petitioner No.1. The learned Counsel submits that the petitioner No.2 is initially connected with the alleged offence.

¶11

Learned Counsel for the State, however, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶12

Considering the materials available against the petitioners and having regard to the fact that the principal accused is Soleman Mallick and he has been arrested and the nature of the allegations so far as the present petitioner is concerned is omnibus in nature, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner No.1 on the following conditions:-

¶13

¶14

The petitioner shall surrender before the Jurisdictional Special Court within a period of four weeks from date and the Jurisdictional Special Court after assessment of the age would allow the petitioner to furnish a bond of Rs.5000/- with two sureties of like amount each and ensure the presence of the petitioner on each and every date fixed by the Special Court.

¶15

With the aforesaid observation, the application for anticipatory bail, being CRM No.719 of 2021, is, thus, disposed of.

¶16

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶17

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)

Taiyara Khatun @ Tamina Khatun Anb Another v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taiyara Khatun @ Tamina Khatun Anb Another v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mizanur Rahman @Sk Mizanur Vs State of West Bengal

Md. Imran Alam @ Imran Alam Vs State of West Bengal

Ajibar Sardar Vs State of West Bengal

Anil Chandra Sahoo@ Anil Kumar Sahoo Vs State of West Bengal

Md. Almgir Mondal @ Alamgir Mondal @ Alam Vs State of West Bengal

Babar Ali Mondal Vs State of West Bengal